MAP: https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2025/12/navigation-map-water-giraffe-fractal.html

Ontological Forensics // Pretense, Seeming, Circumstances

"Pretense isn’t real. Seeming isn’t real. Circumstances aren’t real."

This is the triple-audit: the forensic sweep that exposes the soft underbelly of reality’s stagecraft. With Situations already dismantled, we now cut away the subtler illusions that make situations possible: pretense, seeming, and circumstances. Each claims to offer orientation. Each is a counterfeit map.

---

1. PRETENSE // “Pretense isn’t real.”

Pretense assumes that there is a stable self capable of pretending and a stable world capable of being deceived. This would be a charming theory if either the self or the world possessed structural integrity.

They do not.

Pretense is therefore an illusion built on illusions. It requires:

• an agent coherent enough to perform a role,

• an observer coherent enough to misinterpret it,

• and a shared ontology coherent enough to stabilize the deception.

None of these entities exist as described. Pretense is simply the panic-layer we add when we fear that sincerity might not work.

Forensic finding: Pretense is not a mask. It is the frantic attempt to put on a mask while discovering you have no face.

---

2. SEEMING // “Seeming isn’t real.”

Seeming is the metaphysical discount version of being. It claims that phenomena appear "as if" they had stable attributes, when in fact they are:

• momentary light-arrangements,

• misread affordances,

• cognitive shortcuts,

• and provisional guesses dressed as perception.

Seeming is less a feature of objects than of organisms too tired to conduct full ontological audits every five seconds.

If seeming were real, stability would follow. But seeming never settles; it flickers.

Forensic finding: Seeming is what you get when the universe shrugs, and the mind writes a paragraph about it.

---

3. CIRCUMSTANCES // “Circumstances aren’t real.”

Circumstances pretend to be the background conditions that explain the foreground event. But when interrogated, they dissolve.

Take any so-called "circumstance" and you find:

• infinite regress (what caused that condition?),

• epistemic fog (why do we believe that was relevant?),

• and narrative convenience (why does the story need that detail?).

Circumstances are just elaborate disclaimers the mind appends to chaos to avoid admitting it cannot predict anything.

Forensic finding: Circumstances are the universe’s version of "I don’t know, just go with it."

---

4. THE INTERLOCK

These three illusions form a self-reinforcing system:

• Pretense depends on seeming.

• Seeming depends on circumstances.

• Circumstances depend on narrative.

• Narrative depends on pretense.

This is not a circle. This is a ponzi scheme of ontology, in which each layer promises stability it borrows from the next.

Once any node is audited, the whole construct becomes uninsurable.

---

5. TRANSITIONAL FINDING

Because pretense, seeming, and circumstances are unreal, nothing that relies on them for coherence survives forensic scrutiny.

Our next audit will take aim at the metaphysical glue that people invoke to hold these illusions together:

“Context isn’t real.”