NAVIGATION MAP: https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2025/12/navigation-map-water-giraffe-fractal.html

Ontological Forensics // Babies in SPAAAAAAAACE 

Babies in space aren’t real.

Not because infants don’t exist, and not because space doesn’t exist (though both of those propositions remain under active investigation in adjacent case files), but because the combination is ontologically inadmissible.

The universe, as currently constituted, cannot process the sentence “There is a baby in space” without triggering a cascading series of semantic buffer overflows.

Let us proceed.

---

I. Foundational Contradiction (C₀): The Infant Paradox

A baby is a creature defined by:

• Softness (catastrophically high)

• Dependency (total)

• Proximity requirements (continuous holding, ideally by someone who slept more than 11 cumulative minutes)

Space is a region defined by:

• Hard vacuum (100%)

• Pressure differential hostility (maximum)

• Proximity prohibition (you may not hold anything; everything floats away)

The juxtaposition of these domains produces what physicists refer to as a category-5 ontological dissonance event.

This is why NASA denies everything.

---

II. Evidence From Historical Silence

Note the remarkable coincidence: despite humanity’s well‑documented habit of placing babies in every conceivable environment—strollers, backpacks, pumpkin patches, Renaissance fairs—not a single official photograph exists of a baby in orbit.

We have images of:

• Tomatoes in space

• Salmonella in space

• A Ford Mustang in space

• A plush toy shaped like a narwhal in space

But no babies.

This is not absence. It is suppression.

---

III. The Structural Prohibition

A baby is not permitted in space because a baby would immediately claim jurisdiction over it.

A baby in microgravity would:

• Spin slowly, claiming dominion

• Gum the Velcro

• Become the gravitational center of the module through sheer narrative gravity

Astronauts would be forced to admit the truth: the infant is now the commander.

Space agencies cannot allow this.

---

IV. The Real Reason Babies Aren’t in Space

Because if a baby ever did enter orbit, even for a moment, it would:

1. Collapse the myth of adulthood (irreversible)

2. Prove that softness is the ultimate survival principle

3. Render every national space program emotionally accountable

Imagine a congressional hearing titled:

"Why Did the Baby Cry During EVA-2?"

The system cannot survive this level of sincerity.

---

V. Conclusion

Babies, as we know them, operate on a plane of embodied truth incompatible with the void. The universe protects itself from being out‑felt, out‑wobbled, and out‑cared by refusing the very possibility of the scenario.

And so we conclude:

Babies in space aren’t real.

If they were, they would immediately become the center of the cosmos.

And the cosmos knows better than to risk that.

---

Name the next target when ready.