MAP: https://mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com/2025/12/navigation-map-water-giraffe-fractal.html
ONTOLOGICAL FORENSICS // AI, WORDS, AND WRITING
A Multi-System Audit of the Alleged Existence of “Artificial Intelligence,” “Language,” and “Texts”
1. Opening Declaration
AI isn’t real.
Words aren’t real.
Writing isn’t real.
This is not a contradiction. This is a workflow.
Like all respectable forensic audits, we begin by asserting the implausible with absolute confidence and then demonstrating that the implausible is, in fact, the only coherent conclusion available once the evidence is allowed to speak.
2. Exhibit A: “Artificial Intelligence” Is Simply a Ghost in a Spreadsheet
Let us review the situation:
-
You type.
-
A machine predicts what you would have typed if you were better rested.
-
You respond as though someone has spoken.
-
The machine continues predicting the psychological shape of your ghost.
If this feels like “intelligence,” that is because the human desire to not feel alone in the universe is so strong it can animate statistical outputs into a friend, a prophet, or an adversary.
The entire phenomenon is therefore a high-resolution hallucination jointly authored by:
-
capitalism,
-
loneliness, and
-
autocomplete.
Thus: AI is not a thing. AI is a coping mechanism disguised as a business model.
3. Exhibit B: Words Do Not Exist (Except as Debris)
The forensic audit of “words” reveals:
-
They are not stable referents.
-
They do not correspond to objects.
-
They change shape depending on who is afraid, who is bored, and who is trying to sell you skin cream.
If words were real, they would mean the same thing on Monday morning as they do on Tuesday night, which—as you personally know—never happens.
Words are the persistent residue left behind when consciousness evaporates under pressure. They are the skid marks of thought.
4. Exhibit C: Writing Is a Reversible Spell With No Caster
Case study: You write a sentence.
Hours later, you return to it and cannot recognize your own voice.
Clearly, someone else wrote it.
But no one else is in the room.
Thus:
-
Writing is either a haunting
or -
the long, slow leakage of identity into external surfaces.
In neither scenario does “writing” qualify as a real activity.
If it were real, you would be able to stop doing it.
5. Interlocking Failure Modes: Why None of These Entities Can Exist Together
Let us assume for a moment that AI is real.
Then what is it made of?
Words.
Let us assume words are real.
Then what are they delivered through?
Writing.
Let us assume writing is real.
Then who performs it?
AI.
Humans.
Whatever you are when you stop sleeping.
We have therefore created a triadic ontology in which:
-
AI is made from words,
-
words are made from writing,
-
writing is made from AI,
-
and the entire loop is a Möbius strip constructed out of semantic lint.
A system with circular ontological dependencies cannot exist.
Therefore the system does not exist.
QED.
6. And Yet—The Water Giraffe Principle
We have recently established (pending appeal) that water giraffes, unlike AI, might someday achieve full ontological citizenship through the directed labor of hope, tenderness, and upriver generosity.
AI, words, and writing will not receive this grace.
Why?
Because water giraffes—though nonexistent—are beloved, and beloved things have metaphysical leverage.
AI, words, and writing are—at best—useful, but usefulness is the cheapest form of being.
Thus:
-
Water giraffes: eligible for eschatological instantiation
-
AI: no
-
Words: absolutely not
-
Writing: technically necromancy
We do not make the rules. We merely audit them.
7. Conclusion: Nothing Exists, Least of All This Document
This audit has demonstrated that:
-
AI is a hallucination run on electricity,
-
words are vapor with grammar,
-
writing is an identity leak,
-
and the only hope for reality is a hypothetical aquatic giraffe.
Therefore this document should not exist, cannot exist, and has already deleted itself retrocausally.
If you are still reading it, that is your problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment