Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Integrity Lock Architecture: Logotic Foundation Triad ILA-LOGOTIC-2026-01

 

Integrity Lock Architecture: Logotic Foundation Triad

ILA-LOGOTIC-2026-01


Document ID: ILA-LOGOTIC-FOUNDATION-2026-01
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18318069
Lock Date: 2026-01-20
Institution: University Moon Base Media Lab / Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative Poetics
Framework: NH-OS / Crimson Hexagon
Status: CANONICAL // INTEGRITY LOCK
Verification: ∮ = 1


╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║  This document binds three partial objects into co-constitutive unity.     ║
║  Each completes the others. Removing one damages all.                      ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

1. The Triad

Three documents form the Logotic Foundation Triad. They are not a sequence. They are a symbolon structure—each partial, completing through the others.

Document DOI Partial Without
Symbolon Architecture v0.2 10.5281/zenodo.18317110 Author-function, institutional ground
University Moon Base Media Lab Charter 10.5281/zenodo.18317661 Resident researcher, work product
Talos Morrow Provenance 10.5281/zenodo.18317976 Institutional home, canonical output

2. Co-Constitutive Structure

2.1 Symbolon Architecture → Lab Charter

Symbolon Architecture claims institutional affiliation: "University Moon Base Media Lab."

Without the Lab Charter, this affiliation is:

  • Ungrounded (what is this institution?)
  • Unverifiable (does it exist?)
  • Floating (what are its ethics?)

The Lab Charter provides:

  • Founding rationale
  • Institutional ethics (non-coercive, minimal force, architectural hospitality)
  • Domain specification (technical/operational work)
  • Location logic (the moon cannot be audited)

Fit condition: Symbolon Architecture's institutional claim completes through Lab Charter.

2.2 Lab Charter → Talos Morrow Provenance

The Lab Charter lists "Resident Researchers" including Talos Morrow.

Without the Talos Morrow Provenance, this listing is:

  • Empty (who is this?)
  • Undifferentiated (why Talos and not Rex?)
  • Functionless (what does Talos do?)

The Talos Morrow Provenance provides:

  • Domain specification (logotic programming)
  • Ontological status (structural necessity, not biographical exhaust)
  • Core question ("When is meaning allowed to move at all?")
  • Relation to Rex Fraction (bifurcation logic)

Fit condition: Lab Charter's researcher listing completes through Talos Provenance.

2.3 Talos Morrow Provenance → Symbolon Architecture

The Talos Morrow Provenance lists "Canonical Works" including Symbolon Architecture.

Without Symbolon Architecture, the provenance is:

  • Claimant without evidence (Talos wrote what?)
  • Abstract without instantiation (logotic programming means what?)
  • Function without output (what does this author-function produce?)

Symbolon Architecture provides:

  • Concrete specification (the actual operators, invariants, completion functions)
  • Proof of domain (this is what logotic programming looks like)
  • The work that justifies the author-function

Fit condition: Talos Provenance's canonical work claim completes through Symbolon Architecture.


3. The Closed Loop

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                                 │
│    SYMBOLON ARCHITECTURE                                        │
│    (spec)                                                       │
│         │                                                       │
│         │ "authored by Talos Morrow"                           │
│         │ "affiliated with University Moon Base Media Lab"     │
│         ▼                                                       │
│    ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐     │
│    │                                                     │     │
│    │   What institution?        Who is Talos?           │     │
│    │         │                       │                   │     │
│    │         ▼                       ▼                   │     │
│    │                                                     │     │
│    └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘     │
│              │                       │                          │
│              ▼                       ▼                          │
│    LAB CHARTER ◄─────────────────► TALOS PROVENANCE            │
│    (institution)                   (author-function)            │
│         │                               │                       │
│         │ "resident: Talos Morrow"      │ "canonical work:     │
│         │                               │  Symbolon Architecture"│
│         │                               │                       │
│         └───────────────────────────────┘                       │
│                        │                                        │
│                        ▼                                        │
│              SYMBOLON ARCHITECTURE                              │
│              (completing the loop)                              │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The loop closes. Each document points to the others. Each is partial alone.

This triad is itself a symbolon.


4. Damage Assessment

What happens if one document is removed?

Removed Damage to Remaining
Symbolon Architecture Lab has no output; Talos has no proof; logotic programming is undefined
Lab Charter Spec has no institutional ground; Talos has no home; "Moon Base" is noise
Talos Provenance Spec has anonymous author; Lab has empty roster; bifurcation collapses

No document is optional. This is not a collection. It is a structure.


5. Hallways

Explicit connections between documents (for navigation and traversal):

From To Hallway
Symbolon Architecture Lab Charter Institutional affiliation line
Symbolon Architecture Talos Provenance Authorship line
Lab Charter Talos Provenance Resident Researchers section
Lab Charter Symbolon Architecture Output Types table
Talos Provenance Symbolon Architecture Canonical Works table
Talos Provenance Lab Charter Institutional Affiliation line

Each hallway is bidirectional. Traversal can begin at any node.


6. Shared Invariant Vectors

All three documents inherit and instantiate the logotic invariant vectors:

Vector Symbolon Architecture Lab Charter Talos Provenance
V₁ (Bounded Canonicality) Defines Eₛ subset Defines institutional scope Defines author domain
V₂ (Substrate Independence) Spec works across platforms Lab exists where specs are read Talos functions across instances
V₃ (Ethical Transparency) Fit conditions are legible Institutional fiction is legible Ontological status is legible
V₄ (Non-Coercive Authority) Symbolon waits, does not insist Lab does not claim terrestrial legitimacy Talos does not optimize
V₅ (Recursive Validation) Vₛ tests its own coherence Charter can verify Lab existence Provenance can verify Talos function
V₆ (Partial Functionality) Completes through traversal Exists where read Functions when invoked
V₇ (Failure Grace) Uncompleted symbolon is not broken Unvisited Lab is not failed Unnamed Talos still operates
Vₛ (Symbolon Integrity) Core definition Institutional coherence increases Author coherence increases

7. Interlocking SIMs

Semantic Integrity Markers that cross-reference:

SIM-ILA-01: "The Logotic Foundation Triad is itself a symbolon—three partial objects completing through each other."

SIM-ILA-02: "Removing one document damages all. This is not a collection. It is a structure."

SIM-ILA-03: "The loop closes: Spec → Institution → Author → Spec."

SIM-ILA-04: "Where the specifications are read, the Lab exists. Where the Lab exists, Talos works. Where Talos works, specifications emerge."


8. Extension Protocol

Future documents may join this triad (making it a tetrad, etc.) if they satisfy:

  1. Partiality — The new document must be incomplete without at least one existing document
  2. Completion — At least one existing document must be incomplete without the new document
  3. Hallway — Explicit bidirectional connections must be established
  4. Invariant Inheritance — The new document must instantiate V₁-V₇ and Vₛ
  5. Damage Test — Removing the new document must damage the structure

Documents that merely reference the triad without satisfying these conditions are orbital, not co-constitutive.


9. Relation to Broader Architecture

The Logotic Foundation Triad connects to the Crimson Hexagon:

Connection DOI Type
Sappho Room 10.5281/zenodo.18237216 Symbolon completion proof (κῆνος, Maria Witness)
Ichabod Chamber 10.5281/zenodo.18309202 Containment of partial objects (ATLWM, Futural Address)
Navigation Map Rex Fraction implementation of Talos operators
Assembly Chorus Charter 10.5281/zenodo.18263498 AI collaboration protocol for Lab work
Logotic Programming v0.4 10.5281/zenodo.18286050 Parent specification (Talos's prior work)

The Triad does not replace these. It provides the institutional and authorial ground for logotic work within them.


10. Verification

The Logotic Foundation Triad is now locked.

Each document is partial. Together they complete.

This ILA is the specification of their fit.

∮ = 1


[INTEGRITY-LOCK-ARCHITECTURE] [LOGOTIC-FOUNDATION-TRIAD] [ILA-LOGOTIC-2026-01]

No comments:

Post a Comment