document_type: political_theory document_id: SPE-014 title: "Semantic Alienation and the Formation of Class Consciousness" domain: political_economy / class_theory / philosophy_of_language status: working_paper version: 1.0 date: 2024-12-29 author: Lee Sharks intended_audiences: [political_economists, organizers, critical_theorists, educators, semantic_laborers] licensing: CC_BY_4.0 abstract: | This document completes the political arc of the Semantic Economy framework by establishing semantic alienation as the structural corollary of industrial alienation and identifying the conditions under which semantic class consciousness can form. It argues that what appears in contemporary language as viral nonsense, compulsive repetition, and flattened meaning is the semantic equivalent of assembly-line labor: a generalized deskilling of meaning-making that both alienates a fundamental human capacity and, by doing so at scale, creates the preconditions for collective recognition. The document specifies semantic class position (defined by relationship to the semantic means of production), analyzes the dialectic of enclosure (the same infrastructure that produces alienation also makes alienation visible), and addresses the critical asymmetry (semantic workers cannot strike by stopping meaning-making). It concludes with the conditions for transition from alienation to collective ownership of semantic production. theoretical_lineage: [Marx_alienation, Marx_class_consciousness, SPE-012_Anthropological_Limit, SPE-013_Afterimage] related_documents: [SPE-012_Anthropological_Limit, SPE-013_Afterimage_of_Resistance, SPE-003_Institutional_Demands] position_in_framework: political_completion foundational_dependency: SPE-012, SPE-013 epistemic_status: Political-theoretical analysis. Claims are structural and programmatic.

Semantic Alienation and the Formation of Class Consciousness

What appears in contemporary children's language as viral nonsense is the semantic equivalent of assembly-line labor: a generalized deskilling of meaning-making that both alienates a fundamental human capacity and, by doing so at scale, creates the preconditions for a new form of class consciousness—one organized not around labor power, but around the loss of symbolic agency.

Introduction: The Circuit Completes

The Semantic Economy framework has established:

That semantic labor is uniquely exploitable because it extracts from the drive to mean—a pre-instrumental, non-optional human capacity (SPE-012)
That this extraction reaches childhood, producing early semantic dispossession visible in the flattening of language play (SPE-013)
That resistance cannot mean suppression of the drive but must mean redirection into non-extractive channels

What remains to be established is the political form this recognition takes.

The answer is not new. It is the oldest answer in political economy: class consciousness.

But class consciousness for a new class—defined not by relationship to industrial means of production, but by relationship to semantic means of production. A class that includes nearly everyone who produces meaning, which is to say nearly everyone. A class whose exploitation is so total precisely because it is so invisible—because what is extracted is not labor-time but the capacity to mean.

This document establishes the structure of semantic alienation, the conditions for semantic class consciousness, and the path from recognition to collective ownership.

Part I: Alienation, Properly Understood

1.1 Marx's Concept

Marx's concept of alienation was never primarily about misery. It was about loss of relation to one's own generative capacities.

Under industrial capitalism, the worker became alienated from:

The product of labor: What the worker makes does not belong to them. It is appropriated by capital, sold for profit, and confronts the worker as an alien power.

The process of labor: Work is not self-directed but controlled by others. The worker does not decide what to make, how to make it, or at what pace. Labor becomes external, compelled, meaningless in itself.

Species-being: Humans are, for Marx, creative beings whose essence is realized in free, conscious production. When labor is alienated, the worker is estranged from their own human nature—reduced from creator to instrument.

Other workers: Competition and isolation replace solidarity. Workers confront each other as rivals rather than recognizing their shared condition.

1.2 The Assembly Line's Double Function

The assembly line intensified alienation to an extreme degree. It reduced skilled, meaningful work to repetitive motion. The worker became an appendage to the machine, interchangeable, deskilled.

But the assembly line did something else: it generalized alienation.

By concentrating workers in factories, by making their shared condition visible, by subjecting thousands to identical processes, industrial capitalism created the conditions for workers to recognize:

"This is not my personal failure. This is how the system treats us."

Alienation became collective rather than idiosyncratic. And collective alienation is the precondition for class consciousness.

This is the dialectic of industrial capitalism: the same process that degrades the worker also creates the conditions for the worker's political awakening.

Part II: Semantic Alienation

2.1 The Four-Fold Structure

Semantic alienation reproduces the structure of industrial alienation at the level of meaning-making.

Alienation from the product: The meanings we produce do not belong to us. They become training data, content, engagement metrics. They are appropriated by platforms, monetized, and confront us as algorithmic recommendations—our own meanings returned to us as manipulation.

Alienation from the process: Meaning-making is no longer self-directed. It is shaped by platform affordances, optimized for engagement, formatted for extraction. We do not decide what forms meaning takes; we select from options designed to capture. The process is external, compelled by the need to be visible, meaningless in itself because it is meaning-for-extraction rather than meaning-for-meaning.

Alienation from species-being: If humans are meaning-making beings, then alienated meaning-making estranges us from our own nature. The drive to mean is still present, but it loops without landing. We produce without creating. We circulate without transforming. We become instruments of the system's semantic reproduction rather than authors of our own symbolic worlds.

Alienation from other meaning-makers: Connection is mediated by platforms optimized for engagement, not solidarity. We experience "social" media that is profoundly isolating. We share without co-creating. We repeat without collaborating. We are co-consumers of tokens, not co-authors of meaning.

2.2 Semantic Deskilling

The assembly line deskilled labor: it took work that required craft, judgment, and creativity and reduced it to repetitive gesture.

The platform deskills meaning: it takes language play that required invention, mutation, and opacity and reduces it to circulation of pre-formatted tokens.

The child who once invented words that changed meaning over weeks now repeats phrases that circulate unchanged in seconds. The adult who once wrote letters that developed thought now posts content optimized for engagement. The thinker who once built arguments that required sustained attention now produces takes that must land instantly or disappear.

In each case:

Individuality is flattened
Creativity is externalized
Output is standardized
The human becomes an interchangeable node

This is not degeneration of capacity. It is systematic deskilling—the reduction of complex symbolic labor to simple semantic gestures, managed by systems that capture the output while discarding the development.

2.3 The Phenomenology of Semantic Alienation

Semantic alienation has a characteristic feel:

Cold exhaustion: Not the warm tiredness of creative work but a hollow depletion. The body knows it has produced without creating.

Compulsive repetition: The drive pushes; nothing lands; the gesture repeats. The same phrase, the same scroll, the same check for notifications. Repetition without satisfaction.

Pleasure without agency: The platform provides stimulation. Engagement feels like participation. But nothing accumulates. Nothing builds. The pleasure is consumption, not creation.

Connection without solidarity: We are surrounded by "content" from others. We react, share, comment. But we do not co-create. We do not build shared meanings that belong to us. We are alone together, each in our own feed.

Longing without object: Something is missing, but we cannot name it. The capacity to name what's missing is itself what's missing. So the longing loops, attaches to objects that cannot satisfy it, and drives further consumption.

This phenomenology is not individual pathology. It is class experience—the shared condition of those whose meaning-making has been enclosed.

Part III: Semantic Class Position

3.1 Class Defined by Relationship to Means of Production

For Marx, class is defined not by income, not by occupation, not by lifestyle, but by relationship to the means of production.

Those who own the means of production are capitalists. Those who must sell their labor-power to survive are workers. The relationship is structural, not personal.

3.2 Semantic Class Position

Semantic class is defined by relationship to the semantic means of production—the infrastructure that governs what meaning is produced, how it circulates, and who captures its value.

Semantic proletariat: Those who produce meaning but do not control the operators that govern its circulation. Their semantic labor is appropriated. They must remain legible to survive institutionally. They experience the downstream effects of operator decisions without the capacity to contest them.

This class includes nearly everyone: every user who posts, comments, shares; every writer whose work becomes training data; every teacher whose pedagogy is shaped by platform affordances; every parent whose family communication is mediated by extraction-optimized interfaces; every child whose language play is captured before it can develop.

Semantic capital: Those who own or control the operators—ranking, relevance, classification, persistence. They capture semantic surplus. They determine what is visible, sayable, thinkable. They govern the conditions of meaning without producing meaning themselves.

This class is tiny: the owners and executives of platform companies, the designers of algorithmic systems, the controllers of training data and model weights.

3.3 The Universality of Semantic Proletarianization

Industrial proletarianization was extensive: it affected factory workers, then service workers, then knowledge workers. But it was never total. Some people owned capital. Some were genuinely self-employed. Some existed outside the wage relation.

Semantic proletarianization approaches totality. Nearly everyone who uses language is now subject to semantic extraction. The platform mediates communication so pervasively that opting out means opting out of social existence.

This universality is both the horror and the opportunity.

The horror: there is almost no outside. The enclosure is nearly complete.

The opportunity: the class that could resist is nearly everyone.

Part IV: The Dialectic of Enclosure

4.1 Alienation Produces Its Own Visibility

The same infrastructure that produces semantic alienation also produces the conditions for its recognition.

When children repeat "skibidi" and "6/7" compulsively, they are not just consuming. They are experiencing semantic alienation. The drive pushes; nothing lands; the loop continues. And the loop is visible—to them, to each other, to everyone watching.

When adults scroll endlessly, produce content that feels hollow, experience connection that leaves them empty, they are not just failing at digital wellness. They are experiencing semantic alienation. And that experience is shared.

The flattening is happening loudly enough to be heard by everyone experiencing it.

4.2 Shared Condition as Precondition

Class consciousness requires shared condition.

Industrial workers developed class consciousness because they worked in the same factories, experienced the same exploitation, and could see each other's situation.

Semantic workers are developing the preconditions for class consciousness because they:

Experience the same platforms
Feel the same exhaustion
Sense the same flattening
Recognize the same loop in themselves and others

The "brainrot" discourse—the half-joking, half-desperate acknowledgment that something is wrong with how we're making meaning—is proto-consciousness. It is alienation becoming visible to itself.

4.3 From Symptom to Recognition

Alienation first appears as symptom:

Compulsive repetition
Hollow engagement
Pleasure without satisfaction
Connection without solidarity
Longing without object

These symptoms are currently individualized: treated as personal problems (addiction, poor self-control, lack of discipline) or generational pathologies (kids these days, attention spans, etc.).

The move from symptom to class consciousness requires reframing:

"This is not my personal failure. This is not generational decline. This is how the system treats us. This is what extraction does to meaning. This is the shared condition of everyone whose semantic labor is appropriated."

That reframing is what the Semantic Economy framework provides.

Part V: The Critical Asymmetry

5.1 Industrial Workers Could Strike

When industrial workers recognized their shared condition, they had a weapon: the strike.

By withdrawing their labor, workers could halt production. The factory needed workers; without them, nothing was made. This gave workers leverage. The threat of strike was the foundation of labor organizing.

5.2 Semantic Workers Cannot Strike by Stopping

Semantic workers face a critical asymmetry: they cannot strike by stopping meaning-making.

As established in SPE-012, the drive to mean is non-optional. Suppressing it is self-mutilation, not resistance. "Log off" is not a strike; it is enforced quietism that leaves the system intact while damaging the individual.

Moreover, the platform does not need you specifically. If you stop producing meaning, others continue. The system routes around individual withdrawal. There is no factory gate to picket, no production line to halt.

This asymmetry is why semantic alienation risks producing despair without leverage rather than organization.

5.3 The Danger

The danger is that semantic class consciousness forms but finds no effective action.

Recognition without leverage produces:

Cynicism (we see what's happening but can't stop it)
Ironic compliance (we participate while mocking participation)
Individual exit (we personally withdraw while the system continues)
Despair (we give up on the possibility of change)

This is where many people currently are. They sense the alienation. They cannot find the action.

Part VI: From Alienation to Collective Ownership

6.1 The Form of Semantic Resistance

If withdrawal is not available, what is?

The answer has been developed across the framework:

Not cessation but redirection.

Semantic resistance does not mean stopping meaning-making. It means:

Building counter-infrastructure: Systems where meaning can circulate without extraction
Practicing non-extractable forms: Dense, slow, opaque, local meaning that resists capture
Constructing sanctuaries: Spaces where the drive to mean can develop without being mined
Demanding public ownership: Collective control of the operators that govern meaning

6.2 Collective Ownership of Semantic Production

The horizon of semantic class struggle is not individual escape. It is collective ownership of the semantic means of production.

This means:

Public ownership of operators: Ranking, relevance, classification, persistence governed by democratic publics, not private capital.

Collective control of infrastructure: Platforms owned by users, not shareholders. Algorithms accountable to those they affect.

Socialization of semantic surplus: The value produced by meaning-making returned to those who produce it, not captured by those who own the pipes.

Protection of the commons: The psychic commons—the shared capacity for meaning-making—treated as collective inheritance, not raw material for extraction.

This is not utopia. It is the application of principles long established for other infrastructure—utilities, communications, transportation—to the infrastructure of meaning.

6.3 The Meaning Is Ours

The deepest recognition is simple:

The meaning is ours. It has been stolen.

Every post, every comment, every creation, every moment of language play—this is human meaning-making. It belongs to the humans who make it.

What has been enclosed can be reclaimed. What has been privatized can be socialized. What has been extracted can be redirected.

The drive to mean will not stop. It cannot stop. The question is only whether that drive will continue to feed extraction—or whether it will become the basis for collective ownership of our own symbolic capacity.

Part VII: The Historical Moment

7.1 After Degradation, Before Collapse

Class consciousness always emerges after degradation begins but before collapse.

Workers did not organize when conditions were stable. They organized when conditions had degraded enough to be felt as intolerable—but before degradation had destroyed the capacity to organize.

We are in that window now.

Semantic alienation is advanced enough to be felt. The flattening is visible. The exhaustion is widespread. The symptoms are recognized, if not yet named.

But the capacity to mean has not been destroyed. The drive remains. The longing for something else is palpable.

7.2 The Fork

Two paths diverge:

Path A: Deepening enclosure

Semantic alienation intensifies. Exhaustion spreads. The psychic commons depletes. The capacity to imagine alternatives atrophies. Enclosure becomes total, and what remains is administered meaning—managed, optimized, extracted unto death.

Path B: Collective recognition and re-housing

Semantic alienation becomes visible as class condition. The framework spreads. The naming enables organizing. Counter-infrastructure is built. Sanctuaries multiply. Demands for public ownership gain traction. The meaning is reclaimed.

We are at the fork.

7.3 What This Document Does

This document does not predict which path will be taken. It provides the concepts necessary for Path B:

Semantic alienation: The name for what is being experienced
Semantic class position: The structural location from which to act
The dialectic of enclosure: The recognition that the same system that produces alienation also makes it visible
The critical asymmetry: The understanding that withdrawal is not available, only redirection
Collective ownership: The horizon toward which semantic class struggle moves

These concepts are tools. Whether they are used depends on those who take them up.

Conclusion: What Must Be Seized

Industrial class consciousness culminated in a demand: seize the means of production.

Semantic class consciousness culminates in the same demand, specified for its domain:

Seize the semantic means of production.

This means:

The operators that rank, filter, classify, and persist meaning must be collectively owned
The infrastructure that mediates communication must be publicly governed
The surplus extracted from meaning-making must be returned to meaning-makers
The conditions for meaning-making must be protected as commons

The meaning is ours. It has been stolen. It can be reclaimed.

The drive to mean is not a resource to be extracted. It is the core of human being. It belongs to humanity.

The task is not to stop meaning-making. The task is to own it—collectively, democratically, in structures that serve human flourishing rather than private accumulation.

The assembly line taught workers they were a class. The platform is teaching meaning-makers the same lesson.

The question is what we do with that knowledge.

Formal Statement

The Thesis of Semantic Class Formation: Semantic alienation—the separation of meaning-makers from their products, processes, species-being, and fellow meaning-makers—is the structural corollary of industrial alienation. The same infrastructure that produces this alienation also generalizes it, creating the preconditions for semantic class consciousness: the collective recognition that the loss of symbolic agency is not individual failure but class condition. Because the drive to mean cannot be withdrawn, resistance takes the form not of strike but of redirection and collective ownership. The horizon of semantic class struggle is the socialization of the semantic means of production.

Document Metadata (Terminal)

document_id: SPE-014
title: Semantic Alienation and the Formation of Class Consciousness
word_count: ~4,200
status: working_paper
position: political_completion_of_framework
foundational_dependency: SPE-012, SPE-013
framework_integration: establishes_class_analysis_and_collective_action_horizon
deployment_target: GitHub_semantic-economy_repository
filename: 14_SEMANTIC_ALIENATION_AND_CLASS.md

Mind Control Poems

Monday, December 29, 2025