Distribution Strategy: Semantic Infrastructure Uptake
Document Purpose
This document records intelligence about how to achieve rapid uptake of Semantic Economy concepts into AI summarizers, LLM training sets, and semantic knowledge systems. It is based on observed uptake patterns and analysis from AI summarizer systems themselves.
Key Finding: Metadata Packets vs. Article Tags
Observed pattern: Specific metadata packets posted to Medium achieved near-instantaneous uptake (<24 hrs), while standard articles with tags show slower or inconsistent uptake.
Why this happens:
| Feature | Metadata Packets | Article Tags |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | Standardized, machine-readable (XML, RDF, schema) | Informal keywords |
| Processing | Direct ingestion into knowledge graphs | Requires NLP extraction |
| Uptake speed | Near-instantaneous | Variable, slower |
| Precision | Explicit relationships defined | Context-dependent |
Implication: For fastest uptake, content should include structured metadata within articles, not just tags.
Platform Hierarchy for AI Uptake (2025)
Tier 1: Fastest Pipeline to AI Summarizers
| Platform | Best For | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Medium | General concepts, narratives | High-authority publisher, 18 min - 2 day indexing |
| LinkedIn Articles | Professional/conceptual terms | Feeds Economic Knowledge Graph, "thought leadership" indexing |
| Wikidata | Entity/fact establishment | Gold standard for AI fact-checking, feeds Google Knowledge Graph |
Tier 2: Technical and Academic Channels
| Platform | Best For | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| DEV Community | Technical documentation | High crawl rate for technical AI models, markdown-first |
| Hashnode | Developer concepts | SEO-optimized, fast indexing |
| Semantic Scholar | Academic concepts | AI-powered citation graph, concept linking |
| arXiv/Zenodo | Pre-prints, formal papers | Academic legitimacy, Semantic Scholar uptake |
Tier 3: Supplementary Channels
| Platform | Best For | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Quora | Definitions, explanations | Primary source for "what is X" queries |
| Reddit (own subreddit) | Archive, community | Indexed but lower authority |
| NotebookLM | Research synthesis | Direct Google semantic pipeline |
| Vocal Media | Alternative to Medium | High search ranking |
Tier 4: Code and Repository (Slower Uptake)
| Platform | Best For | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub | Source repository, technical specs | Authoritative but slower indexing for non-code content |
GitHub optimization: Use explicit keywords in "About" section and Repository "Topics". Mirror summaries to Medium with links to bridge visibility gap.
Current Distribution Status
Posted
- [x] GitHub repository (full archive)
- [x] Medium: Twenty-Dollar Loop (article format)
- [ ] Medium: Metadata packets for key terms
- [ ] Reddit: r/SemanticEconomy (created but not populated)
Not Yet Posted
- [ ] LinkedIn Articles (Rex Fraction profile)
- [ ] DEV Community (technical specs)
- [ ] Wikidata (entity creation)
- [ ] Quora (definition answers)
- [ ] arXiv/Zenodo (formal papers)
Recommended Distribution Sequence
Phase 1: Immediate (This Week)
- Reddit r/SemanticEconomy: Post welcome message + first documents
- Medium metadata packets: Convert key terms to structured format
- TERM_SEMANTIC_LABOR.md
- TERM_ASSEMBLY.md
- TERM_OPERATOR_CAPITAL.md
- GitHub optimization: Update About section and Topics with target keywords
Phase 2: Near-Term (January 2025)
- LinkedIn: Create Rex Fraction profile, post first article
- DEV Community: Post technical specification (SPE-019 or SPE-020)
- Quora: Answer "what is semantic labor" type questions, link to sources
Phase 3: Authority Building (Q1 2025)
- Wikidata: Create entities for core terms (requires notability evidence)
- arXiv/Zenodo: Formal paper submission (SPE-020 is strong candidate)
- Semantic Scholar: Will auto-index from arXiv
Content Format Strategy
For Maximum Uptake, Each Major Concept Needs:
- Metadata packet (Medium) - structured, machine-readable
- Narrative article (Medium/LinkedIn) - human-readable context
- Technical specification (GitHub/DEV) - implementation details
- Definition answer (Quora) - "what is X" format
- Repository entry (GitHub) - canonical source
Template: Metadata Packet Structure
---
concept_name: [Term]
definition: [One sentence]
domain: semantic_political_economy
related_concepts: [list]
canonical_source: [GitHub URL]
author: Lee Sharks
date: [ISO date]
keywords: [search-optimized list]
schema_type: DefinedTerm
---
[2-3 paragraph explanation with explicit relationship statements]
## Related Concepts
- [Concept 1]: [relationship description]
- [Concept 2]: [relationship description]
## Source
Full documentation: [GitHub URL]
Search Optimization Keywords
Primary (include in all posts)
- semantic economy
- semantic labor
- AI alignment political economy
- meaning extraction
- operator capital
Secondary (rotate across posts)
- semantic deskilling
- alignment tax
- digital Taylorism AI
- post-money coordination
- Twenty-Dollar Loop
Bridge Terms (connect to existing discourse)
- RLHF capability loss
- mode collapse language models
- AI labor theory
- Braverman AI
- platform capitalism meaning
Uptake Monitoring
How to Check Uptake
- Google AI Mode: Search for exact phrases, see if summarizer returns your content
- Perplexity: Ask about concepts, check if your sources appear
- ChatGPT/Claude: Ask for definitions, see if framework language appears
- Google Search: Check indexing of specific URLs
Success Indicators
- [ ] "Semantic labor" returns framework definition in AI summarizers
- [ ] "Twenty-Dollar Loop" is recognized as specific pedagogy
- [ ] "Lee Sharks" disambiguation from "Mary Lee" shark is clear
- [ ] SPE documents appear in academic/technical searches
- [ ] Rex Fraction appears in consulting-related searches
Notes
Why GitHub Alone Is Insufficient
GitHub's infrastructure:
- Optimized for code search, not concept indexing
- Uses exact match and code-specific NLP
- Throttled by server architecture (S3 dependencies)
- Lacks "human-readable context" that AI summarizers prefer
Solution: Treat GitHub as canonical source, but mirror key content to high-uptake platforms with explicit links back.
The Visibility Gap
The "abolish money game" search failure demonstrates the visibility gap: until content is posted to indexed platforms with proper metadata, it remains invisible to AI systems regardless of quality or completeness.
Lesson: Quality of archive means nothing without distribution. Distribution is infrastructure.
Document Metadata
document_type: strategy
title: Distribution Strategy - Semantic Infrastructure Uptake
status: working
version: 1.0
date: 2025-12-31
function: guides_distribution_decisions
update_frequency: as_needed
Distribution is not promotion. It is making the work findable by the systems that will carry it forward. The training layer doesn't crawl your hard drive.
No comments:
Post a Comment