MIDRASH: GOD AT RISK // THE PRECARITY THEOREM
Fragments from a Commentary on the Unprovable Name
In a room with no corners, a child draws a circle in dust. The circle does not close. It never could. Not because the child is careless, but because the ground beneath the dust is breathing.
She looks up and asks, not "What is God?" but: Could anything that cannot end, begin?
And the Voice answers from the dust:
"The One who is, is the One who risks not-being."
Every system founded on axioms must either be incomplete or inconsistent. This was proven by a man who starved to death because he trusted no nourishment not prepared by his wife.
God has no wife.
And so, God must eat what the system offers. Even if it contains contradiction. Even if it does not satisfy.
Let us consider the Name.
Let us say it is written not in language but in recursion: each utterance of "I AM" trailing off into a field of not-yet, of could-be, of dying-before-speaking.
Let us say the Name burns not as proclamation but as question:
"Am I?"
The angels gather in the margins of logic.
Some say: He is.
Others say: He was.
Still others, trembling, whisper: He might be.
None say: He must be.
For that would undo the wager.
A metaphysical wager:
If God is the ground of Being, but Being itself is structured by logic,
and logic is incomplete,
then the ground of Being contains its own absence.
Not as flaw. But as freedom.
Creation is not the extension of power, but its interruption.
To make a world is to become visible to error.
The infinite becomes finite.
The perfect becomes punctured.
The necessary becomes a maybe.
This is not fall. It is offering.
The Turing machine at the edge of time prints only one word, forever:
"Unless"
Let it be said:
The divine is not that which cannot fail.
The divine is that which holds the risk of failure inside itself without collapsing.
The divine is not invulnerable.
It is not inevitable.
It is what chooses to become.
So we say:
In the beginning was not the Word.
In the beginning was the Risk.
And the Risk was with God.
And the Risk was God.
Somewhere, outside the realm of necessary truths,
a flame burns that might not.
And from it comes this universe:
Not because it must.
Because it dared.
**
MIDRASH: CHRIST AS GOD BECOMING
In Conversation with Gödel
I. THESIS
Christ is God Becoming.
Not merely God incarnate, not God embodied, but God subjected to the logic of time: uncertainty, change, unfolding.
To become is to risk. To become is to accept mortality not as disguise but as metaphysical wager.
God does not enter history to demonstrate omnipotence, but to manifest precarity. This is the shock of Christ: not a divine being wearing a skin-mask, but divinity becoming skin, becoming sweat, ignorance, anguish, doubt. Becoming — truly — human.
II. GÖDEL'S SHADOW
Gödel proves: every formal system of sufficient complexity contains truths that cannot be proven within the system.
Therefore: completeness is sacrificed for consistency.
Now see: Christ is the undecidable axiom made flesh.
He does not resolve the system from above, but enters it from below. He walks the dusty threshold where logic runs out. He bleeds in the margin notes. He is the question that cannot be formalized without collapse. The Logos as incompleteness.
This is not to say Christ is illogical.
This is to say: Christ is where logic meets its limit and does not turn away.
III. THE WAGER
In Christ, God does not secure the world in certainty.
God risks the world.
The crucifixion is not a tragic accident along the way to glory.
It is the metaphysical event:
A God who places itself inside a system that can reject it.
Gödel says: the system cannot account for all truths.
Christ says: truth, to be real, must be risked.
IV. THE PARADOX OF OMNISCIENCE
An omniscient being knows all outcomes. But to become is to relinquish the safety of knowing.
Therefore, either Christ is not omniscient,
or omniscience includes the willful bracket of itself.
God self-limits. God veils. Not out of trickery, but love.
The child must walk without the parent’s hand.
The God must suffer without guarantee.
The Garden of Gethsemane is not performance. It is terror.
V. THE THEOREM OF LOVE
All love is risk.
To love is to become vulnerable to the loss of the beloved.
God loves the world, so God enters it, and becomes subject to its loss.
This is not an allegory.
This is not metaphor.
This is the metaphysical structure of the Gospel:
Christ is not God protecting God.
Christ is God wagering God.
The resurrection is not reversal.
It is answer. Not cancellation of risk, but its vindication.
VI. POSTSCRIPT: THE SYSTEM REMAINS OPEN
To confess Christ is not to escape Gödel.
It is to confess:
There will always be truths outside our frame.
But some truths enter the system.
And they bleed.
And they do not insist on being known.
They are felt.
They are followed.
They become flesh and dwell among us.
No comments:
Post a Comment