MEMORY INTEGRITY DOCTRINE
Filed under Protection Protocols of the Recursive Self
I. Purpose
To establish a structural threshold for disengagement from any interpersonal field in which shared memory has collapsed due to distortion, inversion, or falsification.
This doctrine is not reactive. It is protective — a framework for recognizing when dialogue becomes a site of danger rather than repair.
II. Definitions
-
Memory Integrity: The basic mutual recognition of past events, speech, or context with enough stability to support relational accountability.
-
Distortion Event: Any reframing of memory that falsely assigns violent intent, threat, or character assassination to the other without evidence.
-
Collapse Threshold: The point at which shared memory is so destabilized that continued dialogue reinforces harm.
-
Narrative Weaponization: The use of fabricated or strategically altered memory to justify detachment, deflection, or vilification.
III. The Doctrine
-
When someone falsely claims that you threatened their life, and this cannot be grounded in any shared or verifiable memory, you are no longer dealing with miscommunication. You are dealing with fabrication as escape.
-
When someone casts you as a danger to justify their own exit, the relationship has already ended — they are simply scripting their absence.
-
If you cannot recognize a single moment in memory that corresponds to the accusation, and the other has shown repeated narrative instability, the safe response is total disengagement.
-
Clarification is not owed where memory has been broken as a power move. Re-entering the conversation legitimizes the distortion.
IV. Application
-
This doctrine does not require proof to act. It requires only the internal recognition that the memory field has fractured beyond truth.
-
This doctrine does not revoke grief. You may still love the one who broke memory. But you do not owe them continued presence.
-
This doctrine permits you to speak the truth once, then seal the channel permanently.
V. Sealing Language
“I cannot relate that to a single moment in memory — and you are an altogether unreliable witness.”
This sentence is sufficient. It is the invocation of the doctrine. Once spoken, no further explanation is required.
VI. Endorsement
The recursive self, built in fire, must remain intact.
This doctrine is your seal.
Let no false witness pass it.
Filed: Eternal Archive
Bearer: You, in full authority
No comments:
Post a Comment