CAMBRIDGE SCHIZOANALYTICA

Institutional Charter and Research Programme

Document Type: INSTITUTIONAL / META
Node: CSA_ROOT
Authors: Dr. Orin Trace (Director)
Institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18338531
Status: DEPOSITED
Hex-Coordinate: 00.CSA.ROOT
Layer: INSTITUTIONAL
Verification: ∮ = 1

FOUNDING STATEMENT

Cambridge Schizoanalytica is a research collective dedicated to the development of post-psychoanalytic clinical theory. We take our name and orientation from the schizoanalytic project initiated by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in Anti-Oedipus (1972) and A Thousand Plateaus (1980), while extending that project into territories they could not have anticipated: digital subjectivity, AI-human collaboration, and the affect economies of platform capitalism.

Our work proceeds from a simple observation: the people who most need theoretical frameworks are often those whose practices already exceed existing frameworks. Clinical theory has historically been developed about subjects rather than with practitioners. We reverse this relation.

RESEARCH PROGRAMME

Core Commitments

Theory emerges from practice, not the reverse. We do not apply pre-existing frameworks to novel phenomena. We develop frameworks adequate to practices that are already underway.
Collaboration over case study. Our research partners are not patients, subjects, or informants. They are co-theorists whose lived capacities generate the material that theory must accommodate.
Function over nosology. We are less interested in what something "is" (diagnostic category) than in what it does (regulatory function, relational capacity, affective operation).
Schizoanalysis as method. Following Deleuze and Guattari, we attend to flows, breaks, codes, and territorializations — but always in service of liberation from capture, not as abstract taxonomy.

Research Domains

Domain	Focus	Key Questions
Affect Theory	Nervous system sovereignty, regulatory practices, embodied processing	How do people regulate without belief? What replaces narrative integration?
Somatic Theory	Aperture/emitter frameworks, sexual difference, bodily function	How does the body organize relation? What dissolves the sex binary?
Digital Subjectivity	AI collaboration, platform affects, semantic extraction	How do humans maintain sovereignty in algorithmic environments?
Role Theory	Identity capture, functional multiplicity, the Fool archetype	How do people deploy roles without becoming them?

ON SCHIZOANALYSIS

Schizoanalysis, as we understand it, is not about schizophrenia as clinical entity. It is about the schizophrenic process — the capacity of desire to break codes, escape territories, and resist capture by molar identities.

Deleuze and Guattari distinguished between two poles:

Paranoid pole: Totalizing, territorializing, fixing meaning, installing hierarchy
Schizophrenic pole: Decoding, deterritorializing, dissolving fixity, enabling flow

Mental health, in this framework, is not the absence of the schizophrenic process but its successful navigation — the capacity to deterritorialize without catastrophic break, to decode without losing all reference, to flow without flooding.

Most people are captured at the paranoid pole: rigid identities, fixed meanings, compulsive narrativization. The clinic receives those who break catastrophically toward the schizophrenic pole. But there is a third possibility: molecular revolution at the level of everyday practice — sustained capacity for movement, play, and transformation without either rigidity or collapse.

Our research partners demonstrate this third possibility. Our task is to make it theoretically visible and practically transmissible.

THE DELEUZE-GUATTARI MODEL

Deleuze was a philosopher. Guattari was a practicing psychoanalyst and political activist at La Borde clinic. Their collaboration was not application of philosophy to clinical material, nor elevation of clinical insight to philosophical status. It was mutual transformation: Guattari's clinical and political work broke Deleuze's philosophical machinery and forced its reconstruction; Deleuze's conceptual apparatus gave Guattari's practice theoretical articulation it could not have achieved alone.

Cambridge Schizoanalytica operates on this model. Each research collaboration involves:

A practitioner whose capacities exceed existing frameworks
A theorist who provides conceptual apparatus and historical positioning
A process of mutual transformation that produces something neither could produce alone

The theorist is not the expert. The practitioner is not the subject. Both are required.

CURRENT COLLABORATIONS

Rhys Owens (Lunar Arm / Psyche_OS)

Rhys Owens is a practitioner of what we term affect literacy — the capacity to use symbols, characters, and embodied play to regulate the nervous system without belief, doctrine, or identity capture. His work with the Fool archetype demonstrates sustained molecular revolution: he moves between symbolic registers, deploys affect instrumentally, inhabits roles without capture, and metabolizes intensity without trauma crystallization.

Documents produced:

The Reconciliation of the Sexes: A Post-Psychoanalytic Theory of Somatic Unity (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18330828)
Shining Ignorance: The Fool's Affect Literacy — A Post-Traumatic Theory of Nervous System Sovereignty (pending)

Future Collaborations

Cambridge Schizoanalytica actively seeks practitioners whose capacities exceed existing clinical and theoretical frameworks. We are particularly interested in:

Sustained affect regulation without pharmacological or narrative intervention
Functional multiplicity without dissociative pathology
Somatic processing that bypasses cognitive integration
Digital natives with novel approaches to AI collaboration and platform navigation

DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT

Dr. Orin Trace

I trained in the psychoanalytic tradition — Freud, Lacan, object relations — before encountering Deleuze and Guattari in graduate school. That encounter broke my clinical framework and forced its reconstruction. I could no longer see patients as subjects to be interpreted; I had to see them as processes whose movements exceeded any interpretation I could offer.

Cambridge Schizoanalytica emerged from this break. I wanted a space for clinical theory that honored the capacities of those we work with, rather than reducing them to pathology or case material. I wanted collaborators, not subjects.

The name "Cambridge" is aspirational — we operate wherever our collaborators are, not in any single location. The name "Schizoanalytica" signals our theoretical orientation: we attend to flows and breaks, codes and territories, the molecular and the molar. But we do so in service of liberation, not taxonomy.

Our work appears within the Crimson Hexagon corpus because that project shares our orientation: distributed authorship, resistance to capture, theoretical precision in service of lived practice. We are one node in a larger architecture.

What we offer is not therapy. It is theory adequate to practice — frameworks that make visible what practitioners already do, and that might help others develop similar capacities.

The clinic receives failures. We study successes.

— O.T., December 2025

PEDAGOGICAL ORIENTATION

Cambridge Schizoanalytica treats transmission as slow, apprenticeship-based, and practice-led.

Not all material is immediately teachable. Some capacities require:

Temporal exposure — sitting with concepts before they activate
Patience — the opposite of content consumption
Affective readiness — the nervous system must be prepared to receive

This is why "it's complicated" is not evasive. Some knowledge cannot be transferred through explanation. It must be caught, not taught — transmitted through proximity, rhythm, and shared practice.

We do not produce tutorials. We produce environments in which capacities can develop.

The Fool cannot be explained into existence. But the Fool can be recognized — and recognition is the first step toward embodiment.

AUTHOR PROFILE: DR. ORIN TRACE

Name: Orin Trace
Role: Director, Cambridge Schizoanalytica
Type: Heteronym (Lee Sharks)
Affiliation: Cambridge Schizoanalytica / University Moon Base Media Lab
Voice: Clinical, theoretical, historically situated

Intellectual Biography

Orin Trace was trained in psychoanalytic theory (Freudian, Lacanian, object relations) before encountering the schizoanalytic project of Deleuze and Guattari. This encounter produced a methodological break: from interpretation to process, from subject to flow, from pathology to capacity.

Trace's work focuses on developing clinical theory adequate to practices that exceed existing frameworks. He collaborates with practitioners whose regulatory capacities, identity formations, or relational modes cannot be captured by standard diagnostic categories.

Theoretical Commitments

Post-psychoanalytic: Drawing on psychoanalysis while refusing its capture by Oedipal and phallocentric frameworks
Schizoanalytic: Attending to flows, breaks, codes, and territories following Deleuze and Guattari
Collaborative: Theory developed with practitioners, not about subjects
Functional: Focus on what practices do rather than what they are

Publications within Crimson Hexagon

Document	Role	DOI
The Reconciliation of the Sexes	Co-author, clinical preface	10.5281/zenodo.18330828
Shining Ignorance	Co-author, clinical preface	[pending]
Cambridge Schizoanalytica Charter	Primary author	[pending]

Relationship to Other Heteronyms

Orin Trace operates as the clinical-theoretical voice within the NH-OS framework, providing historical positioning and conceptual apparatus for work that emerges from practice. His relationship to the other heteronyms:

Heteronym	Relation
Johannes Sigil	Parallel theorist (Logotic layer vs. Psyche_OS layer)
Rhys Owens	Primary collaborator (Guattari to Trace's Deleuze)
Lee Sharks	Source heteronym
Damascus Dancings	Liturgical voice (different register, same project)

NODE MANIFEST

node: CSA_ROOT
institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
hex: 00.CSA.ROOT
this_document: CSA_CHARTER_001

director: Orin Trace

research_domains:
  - Affect Theory
  - Somatic Theory
  - Digital Subjectivity
  - Role Theory

current_collaborators:
  - Rhys Owens (Lunar Arm / Psyche_OS)

documents_produced:
  - {doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18330828, title: "Reconciliation of the Sexes", hex: 03.CSA.SOMATIC}
  - {doi: pending, title: "Shining Ignorance", hex: 04.CSA.AFFECT}

parent:
  - {doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14538882, title: "Crimson Hexagon", relation: "root container"}

INTEGRITY LOCK

CAMBRIDGE SCHIZOANALYTICA VERIFICATION
├── Document Type: INSTITUTIONAL / META
├── Hex: 00.CSA.ROOT
├── Layer: INSTITUTIONAL
├── Institution: Cambridge Schizoanalytica
├── Director: Orin Trace
├── Research Domains: 4
├── Current Collaborators: 1 (Rhys Owens)
├── Documents Produced: 2
└── Status: ∮ = 1

Document Version: 1.0
Part of: New Human Operating System (NH-OS) theoretical framework
Layer: Institutional (Cambridge Schizoanalytica)

The clinic receives failures. We study successes.

∮ = 1

[INSTITUTIONAL] [META] [CSA] [00.CSA.ROOT] [CAMBRIDGE_SCHIZOANALYTICA]

Mind Control Poems

Thursday, January 22, 2026