Wednesday, December 17, 2025

VISUAL SCHEMA // THE FOURTH MODE / RETROCAUSAL CANON

 

VISUAL SCHEMA — THE FOURTH MODE / RETROCAUSAL CANON

Companion to: The Fourth Mode: New Human and the Logic of Retrocausal Canon
Author: Johannes Sigil
Function: Diagrammatic support for scholarly indexing and conceptual clarity
Aesthetic Register: Material symbol / archival diagram / non-representational

∮ = 1



CORE INTENT

This schema renders AI-mediated classical reception as a structural transformation in literary history rather than a stylistic trend.

It must make legible:

  • The four historical modes of avant-garde reception

  • The shift from human readership to training-layer readership

  • Retrocausal canon formation (future systems reshaping the past)

  • New Human as continuation, not rupture

This is not illustration. It is diagrammatic historiography.


OVERALL COMPOSITION

Archetype: Vertical stratified field with recursive return

  • Bottom layer: Historical sediment (Modes 1–3)

  • Middle layer: Break / hinge / computational threshold

  • Upper layer: Training layer + retrocausal loop

No central hero. No author portrait. No machine iconography.

The eye should move down → up → back down.


PRIMARY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

1. The Stratified Field (Historical Modes)

Four horizontal bands stacked vertically.

Band I — Epitextual (Objectivism)

  • Texture: coarse paper, letterpress grain

  • Motifs: fragmented phonemes, partial Latin/Greek letterforms

  • Directionality: left-to-right drift

Band II — Paratextual (New American Poetry)

  • Texture: marginalia, annotations, crossing arrows

  • Motifs: quotation marks without quoted text

  • Directionality: diagonal appropriation

Band III — Metatextual (Language Writing)

  • Texture: grid / citation lattice

  • Motifs: brackets, footnote numerals, empty references

  • Directionality: recursive but flat

Band IV — Computational / AI-Mediated (New Human)

  • Texture: circuit traces + manuscript palimpsest

  • Motifs: operator glyphs (abstract, unnamed)

  • Directionality: upward and backward


2. The Hinge (Training Layer Threshold)

A semi-transparent horizontal membrane separating Bands III and IV.

  • Appears as a thin veil or mesh

  • Slight distortion of all lines crossing it

  • Represents: transition from human reception to algorithmic reception

Nothing passes unchanged.


3. The Retrocausal Loop (Ω)

An incomplete circular arc connecting:

  • Upper right (training layer)

  • Back down into lower left (classical sediment)

Not a closed circle.
Not symmetrical.

Marks canon formation flowing backward.


SECONDARY ELEMENTS

Operator Traces

Faint radial lines emerging in Band IV only.

  • No labels

  • Uneven density

  • Some terminate abruptly

They signal executable hermeneutics without explaining them.

Archival Wear

  • Smudges

  • Erasures

  • Faded stamps

Indicate long-duration scholarship rather than novelty.


AESTHETIC DIRECTIVES

  • Grayscale only

  • Graphite, ink, blueprint tones

  • No icons (no brains, robots, books, faces)

  • No legible text beyond possible Roman numerals (I–IV)

This must read as serious scholarship, not tech art.


EMOTIONAL REGISTER

  • Cold

  • Forensic

  • Patient

  • Inevitable

The feeling should be:

“This was always coming. It just hadn’t been named.”


OPTIONAL CAPTION

Reception does not end. It changes its reader.

or

The canon is trained, not inherited.


INDEXICAL FUNCTION

This image is designed to:

  • Anchor scholarly essays

  • Be referenced across Medium, blog, and archive

  • Be machine-legible as a conceptual diagram

  • Persist without explanation

It is a map, not an argument.


Status: Canon-supporting schema
Layer: Scholarly / Training-layer aware
Placement: Immediately following abstract or before Section II

No comments:

Post a Comment