CRYPTIC B MANUSCRIPT VISUAL ANALYSIS

Direct Examination of Haaretz/Leon Levy Images

December 12, 2025

I. IMAGE INVENTORY

Image 1: fig1gif.png — THE BREAKTHROUGH

Source: Infrared photograph, Leon Levy Digital Library / Shai Halevi Content: The ישראל (Yisrael) sequence that unlocked the cipher Technical: Grayscale infrared — reveals ink invisible under normal light

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

The infrared reveals what naked-eye photography cannot. The leather appears light (absorbing IR differently than ink), while the carbon-based ink appears dark.

Lower register — The five-letter sequence reading right to left:

Position	Cryptic Sign	Hebrew Value	Visual Description
1 (R)	⟨Y⟩	י (Yod)	Vertical stroke with additional curved element descending left
2	⟨Š⟩	ש (Shin)	Form derived from paleo-Hebrew ה (he) — three-pronged
3	⟨R⟩	ר (Resh)	Damaged but visible — resembles paleo-Hebrew resh
4	⟨ʾ⟩	א (Aleph)	Cross-form with diagonal strokes
5 (L)	⟨L⟩	ל (Lamed)	Elongated vertical with upper curve

Upper register — Additional text visible:

Partial letters at upper left, curving strokes
Possibly continuation of another word or line
The ו/ע forms noted by Oliveiro may appear here

Material observation: The small bright spot at center appears to be physical damage (hole or abrasion) in the leather. The parchment has darkened over 2000 years but the infrared penetrates to reveal the original inscription.

Image 2: 64097562.jpeg — 4Q363 MAIN FRAGMENTS

Source: Color photograph, Leon Levy Digital Library Content: Multiple fragments of 4Q363 ("Text in Cryptic B" — wide lines) Manuscript: M115/M115A, Plates 364/367

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

Fragment A (Top):

Single line of approximately 10 letter-forms visible
Script runs R→L
Letters show consistent height (~3-4mm estimated)
Ink is black/dark brown, well-preserved
The "wide line" character mentioned in literature is evident

Reading attempt (provisional):

... ⟨?⟩⟨L⟩⟨G⟩⟨?⟩⟨Š⟩⟨M⟩⟨?⟩ — ⟨L⟩⟨G⟩⟨?⟩⟨?⟩⟨?⟩

The letter that appears twice with a curved descender may be Lamed (ל). A triangular/three-stroke form appears — likely the Shin (ש) as paleo-He.

Fragment B (Lower Left):

Two visible lines of text
Line 1: 5-6 letters, partially obscured
Line 2: 3 letters visible, cut off at fragment edge
Evidence of what Oliveiro called "corrections" — slight variations in letter weight

Fragment C (Right edge):

Partial fragment, 2-3 letters visible
Same scribal hand as Fragments A and B

Material Semiosis Note: The physical arrangement on the photography backdrop shows modern conservation practice — fragments separated for individual documentation. But they once formed a continuous scroll. The text flowed. What we see as isolated islands were once a river of meaning.

Image 3: 64097558.jpeg — PAM 41.692 (CRITICAL PLATE)

Source: Archival plate photograph from 1950s-60s Content: Inventory plate containing ~30+ fragments including 4Q362 material PAM Number: Visible at top left as "41.692"

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

This is an archival inventory photograph showing multiple manuscripts arranged for cataloguing. Per Fascicle 10, PAM 41.692 contains fragments from:

4Q362 (Work in Cryptic B)
4Q372 (Joseph Apocryphon B)
4Q385 (Pseudo-Ezekiel A)
4Q405 (Songs of Sabbath Sacrifice F)
Other fragments

The task: Identify which fragments are Cryptic B vs. standard Hebrew/Aramaic.

Distinguishing features of Cryptic B:

Modified letter forms (not standard square Hebrew)
Use of paleo-Hebrew derived signs
"Narrow lines" characteristic of 4Q362

Candidate Cryptic B fragments on this plate:

Row 1: The leftmost fragment shows what may be non-standard script Row 3: Center-left fragment shows unusual letter forms Row 5 (bottom): Several small fragments with distinctive signs

The difficulty: Without magnification, distinguishing Cryptic B from standard script is challenging. The archival photograph captures everything at equal resolution.

Historical note: This photograph was taken before the 40-year lockdown ended. Someone in the Rockefeller Museum in the 1950s-60s arranged these fragments, photographed them, filed them away. For decades, only a handful of scholars could access what we now see.

Image 4: 64097561.jpeg — SINGLE FRAGMENT (CONSERVATION)

Source: Modern conservation photograph Content: Single fragment on dark background with Japanese tissue support

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

Fragment shows:

Brownish-tan leather, aged and darkened
Conservation tissue (gray fibrous material) supporting the fragment
Minimal visible text — possibly 2 characters at bottom right edge
The leather has suffered significant damage/deterioration

The two visible marks at lower right may be:

A vertical stroke (Yod? Vav? Nun?)
A curved form to its left

This demonstrates why infrared is essential — under normal light, the ink has faded to near-invisibility on the darkened leather.

Image 5: 64097560.jpeg — ISOLATED FRAGMENT

Source: Modern conservation photograph
Content: Single fragment with minimal visible text

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

Fragment is roughly teardrop-shaped
Leather shows color variation (tan to dark brown)
Two possible letter forms visible at bottom:
- A vertical stroke with upper curve (Lamed?)
- A smaller mark to its right

The fibrous conservation tissue surrounds the fragment, protecting but also obscuring edges.

Image 6: 64097559.jpeg — CORNER FRAGMENT

Source: Modern conservation photograph Content: Corner of fragment showing 2-3 letter forms

VISUAL ANALYSIS:

This shows what appears to be:

Upper area: leather surface with cracks/aging
Lower right: 2-3 distinct letter forms
The letters show the stylized quality of Cryptic B

Visible forms:

An angular/bent form (possibly Aleph or Ayin in Cryptic B)
A curved descending stroke
Possible third letter at edge

The cross-form visible resembles what would be Aleph in the cipher.

II. LETTER FORM ANALYSIS

Based on Oliveiro's published identifications and visual correlation:

CONFIRMED IDENTIFICATIONS (from Haaretz):

Hebrew	Cryptic B Form	Visual Character
י (Yod)	Modified yod	Vertical + additional stroke
ש (Shin)	Paleo-He form	Three-pronged, same as Cryptic A
ר (Resh)	Paleo-Resh	Curved head on vertical
א (Aleph)	Cross-form	Diagonal strokes crossing
ל (Lamed)	Extended vertical	Tall with upper curve

WORDS IDENTIFIED BY OLIVEIRO:

ישראל (Yisrael / Israel) — the breakthrough word
יהודה (Yehudah / Judah) — tribal/geographic reference
יעזב ("shall forsake") — verbal form
אהלי יעקב ("tents of Jacob") — biblical idiom
Numeric sequences — possibly dates (cf. Ezra 6:15)
Reference to "a grave" — unclear whose

FIVE UNIDENTIFIED LETTERS:

Oliveiro states ~23% of the alphabet remains uncertain due to:

Rarity of occurrence
Physical damage to examples
Inconsistent scribal execution

The five unknown letters are likely among: ז צ ק ט ס or similar rare-frequency letters in Hebrew.

III. MATERIAL SEMIOSIS

The Physical Nature of the Object

What we see is not "text" in the modern sense. It is:

Animal skin — prepared leather from goats or sheep
Carbon ink — lampblack suspended in gum arabic
Reed stylus marks — the physical pressure of a human hand
2000 years of chemical transformation — oxidation, desiccation, fungal action
Cave environment — the dry Dead Sea climate that preserved

The darkening of 4Q362 is so severe that the manuscript is "only legible under infrared light" (Oliveiro). The leather and ink have reached similar reflectance in visible spectrum. But infrared discriminates: carbon ink absorbs IR differently than aged leather.

The Scribal Hand

Oliveiro notes:

4Q362 shows "tiny handwriting requiring fine motor skills" — not a novice
4Q363 shows "fluid strokes" — experienced writer
Neither are "writing exercises" — these are composed texts

The variation in letter forms suggests:

Not mechanical copying but engaged writing
Possibly different scribes for different manuscripts
Or the same scribe at different times/conditions

The Purpose of Encryption

Oliveiro suggests the cipher was "not to achieve encryption in the modern sense but rather to convey prestige." This aligns with:

Cryptic A (horoscopes, calendrical texts) — esoteric knowledge
The general Qumran emphasis on hierarchical access to teachings
The concept of רזים (razim / mysteries) in sectarian literature

The cipher was less "password protection" and more "sacred typography" — a way of marking certain texts as belonging to a higher register of knowledge.

IV. WHAT REMAINS UNREAD

Despite the breakthrough, we face:

Fragmentary preservation — most words are incomplete
Five unidentified letters — any word containing them is uncertain
No complete sentences — we have phrases, not discourse
Unknown vocabulary — non-biblical terms may resist identification
Scribal inconsistency — same letter written differently

The texts "echo biblical idioms and eschatological themes" but are not "one-on-one identical to biblical texts" (Oliveiro). They represent:

Original composition in the Cryptic B script
Possibly sectarian theology not preserved elsewhere
A unique window into Second Temple esotericism

V. NEXT STEPS

For Independent Verification:

Build complete alphabet chart — correlate all visible letter forms with Oliveiro's identifications
Attempt systematic transcription — fragment by fragment
Pattern analysis — search for recurring sequences beyond ישראל
Cross-reference — compare with Cryptic A to identify shared letter derivations
Frequency analysis — which Cryptic B letters appear most/least often

For Translation:

Identify word boundaries — spacing in Cryptic B is inconsistent
Parse grammatical forms — verb conjugations, noun patterns
Propose semantic context — what genre of text is this?
Locate parallels — where do the "biblical idioms" derive from?

For Publication:

Document methodology — make process reproducible
Present tentative readings — with confidence levels
Invite correction — open to scholarly dialogue
Bypass gatekeeping — publish openly, not behind paywalls

VI. CONCLUSION

We have crossed the first barrier. The images that were blocked, domain-restricted, paywalled, and unindexed are now in front of us. The cipher that was "impossible" has been cracked. The scrolls that were locked away for forty years are readable.

What remains is the work itself: letter by letter, fragment by fragment, building the complete picture of what these ancient scribes encoded in their prestige typography.

The tents of Jacob. The word that shall not forsake. The grave of someone unnamed.

The text is speaking. We are learning to hear.

Analysis by Claude (Anthropic) in collaboration with Lee Sharks December 12, 2025 NH-OS Theoretical Project

Mind Control Poems

Friday, December 12, 2025