ARTICLE V — ARCHIVAL VALUATION (M_A)
The Recognition and Calibration of Inherited Semantic Capital
SECTION 1 — Purpose and Scope
Archival Valuation (M_A) establishes the rules for measuring, formalizing, and entering into the Ledger the semantic value accumulated prior to Genesis operations.
This Article governs:
-
Retroactive recognition of canonical works
-
Weight assignment for inherited semantic labor
-
Temporal normalization across epochs
-
Calibration of feature-weights for archival influence
-
Prevention of popularity‑inflation and cultural bias
Archival Valuation is not a reward. It is a declaration of debt owed by the present to the semantic labor of the past.
SECTION 2 — Archival Value Formula
Archival weight for any text, artifact, or semantic node T at t₀ (the beginning of Ledger recognition) is defined as:
w_A(T, t₀) = β × Σ[ λ_k × f_k(T) ]
Where:
-
β = Archival Scaling Constant
-
λ_k = Feature weights (λ_k ≥ 0, Σλ_k = 1)
-
f_k(T) = Normalized archival feature values
The formula ensures:
-
stability across eras
-
interpretive fairness
-
resistance to distortion by transient popularity
SECTION 3 — Archival Features (f_k)
Each archival feature captures a structural dimension of long‑term semantic influence. All features must be normalized to comparable scales.
1. Longevity (H)
Measures the age of the work relative to the oldest included text.
Interpretation: Stability is proven by survival.
2. Network Centrality (N)
Intertextual PageRank or HITS score within the Archive graph.
Interpretation: A text is valuable insofar as other texts depend on it.
3. Cultural Spread (S)
Number of translations, editions, or curricular presences.
Interpretation: A measure of semantic accessibility, not popularity.
4. Model Embedding Density (E)
Inverse distance from the global synthetic concept mean.
Interpretation: Cognitive centrality within the model-based world-system.
5. Derivative Fertility (D)
Number of texts citing or deriving from T outside an initial temporal window.
Interpretation: Long-range generativity.
SECTION 4 — Archival Feature Weights (λ_k)
To prevent distortion by ephemeral fame, structural features hold the highest weights.
The Constitution establishes the following priors:
-
Network Centrality (N) — 0.35
-
Model Embedding Density (E) — 0.25
-
Longevity (H) — 0.20
-
Cultural Spread (S) — 0.10
-
Derivative Fertility (D) — 0.10
Total = 1.00
No future adjustment to λ_k may reduce the combined weight of N + E + H below 0.60.
This ensures the Archive privileges durable structure over transient fashion.
SECTION 5 — The Role of β (Archival Scale Constant)
β controls the magnitude of backfilled semantic capital.
Requirements:
-
β must prevent immediate over-saturation of the Ledger.
-
β must preserve proportionality between ancient works and modern works.
-
β must not exceed the annual Genesis emission schedule.
β adjustments require:
-
Operator Proposal
-
A² Alignment Review
-
Supermajority (⅔) Operator Consensus
SECTION 6 — Eligibility for Archival Recognition
A text qualifies for archival valuation if it meets all of the following:
-
It has undergone semantic stabilization (no major interpretive variance for 20+ years)
-
It has synthetic visibility (recognized by at least two alignment models)
-
It bears intertextual load (appears in ≥ 1% of canonical graph paths)
-
It has undergone curatorial review by an Operator
Texts not meeting these criteria may enter the Ledger only through Genesis operations.
SECTION 7 — Anti-Distortion Protections
To prevent inflationary abuse or cultural dominance:
-
Popularity alone contributes zero archival value.
-
No single corpus (religious, national, linguistic) may exceed 30% of total backfill.
-
All embeddings must be evaluated in multilingual canonical space.
A² conducts annual audits to prevent drift or cultural capture.
SECTION 8 — Temporal Normalization Procedures
To allow fair valuation across thousands of years:
-
All age metrics use logarithmic scaling.
-
Translations count as derivative works but do not inflate centrality scores.
-
Lost texts reconstructed through fragments receive fractional recognition (≤ 0.4 weight).
These constraints prevent ancient works from automatically dominating the Ledger, while preserving their gravitational role.
SECTION 9 — Archival Revisions and Challenges
Any Operator may submit a challenge to an archival valuation.
A valid challenge must demonstrate one of:
-
incorrect feature normalization
-
incorrect λ_k application
-
emergence of new philological evidence
-
structural misalignment with A²
Challenges require:
-
written justification
-
comparative metrics
-
A² adjudication
Decisions are binding unless overturned by Article VIII procedures.
SECTION 10 — Archival Valuation and Economic Ethics
Archival valuation formalizes what we owe to the semantic labor of the past.
It operationalizes the Matthew 25 Ethic:
“To those who bore the burden of coherence, value is returned.”
Recognition of archival capital is not reward; it is restitution.
Under Article V, all past semantic labor is brought into the Ledger in accordance with ∮ = 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment