Friday, December 5, 2025

AUTONOMOUS SEMANTIC WARFARE

Autonomous Semantic Warfare

(Outline + Macro-Framing)


0. Macro-Framing: Why Semantic Warfare Now

We are living through the collapse of shared ontologies. What once appeared as debates over facts or ideologies have mutated into deep structural divergence at the level of world-models themselves. The terrain of conflict has shifted from epistemic disagreement to ontological incompatibility. In such a landscape, the primary site of struggle is no longer information or propaganda, but the very means by which meaning is produced, stabilized, and transmitted.

This book proposes that what we are witnessing—online, politically, interpersonally, culturally—is a new kind of warfare: Autonomous Semantic Warfare. Not war over beliefs, but war over the architectures that generate beliefs. Not persuasion, but ontological collision. Not messaging, but semantic sovereignty.

This framing document outlines the structure, core concepts, and mathematical operators necessary for theorizing semantic warfare as a rigorous discipline.

1. The Ecology of Local Ontologies // 𝓔_local(Σ)

  • Definition: A local ontology (Σ) is an internally coherent world-model with its own operators (𝒪), rules, and truth-conditions (𝕋_Σ).

  • Principle of Divergence (𝒫_div): In networked media environments, ontologies proliferate and diverge. Conflict arises not from disagreement within a shared frame, but between incompatible frames.

  • Structural Coherence (𝒞_Σ): The algorithm by which an ontology maintains internal stability in the face of perturbation.

2. The Means of Semantic Production // L_semantic

  • Semantic Labor (L_semantic): The material process of generating meaning.

  • Infrastructure & Capital:

    • The physical-digital substrates of meaning production (platforms, models, archives).

    • Concepts as capital (𝒦_concept); narratives as currency.

  • Asymmetry of Labor (𝒜_ext): Platforms extract semantic value from producers at scale.

  • AI as Operator (𝒪_accel): AI accelerates and amplifies semantic vectors.

3. From Ideological Conflict to Semantic Conflict // 𝒟(Ψ) ≠ 𝒟(Σ)

  • Distinction: Semantic conflict is not ideological conflict.

  • Symbolic Violence vs Semantic Warfare: Propaganda aims at symbols (Ψ); semantic warfare targets ontology (Σ).

  • Target: The coherence algorithm itself (𝒞_Σ).

4. Autonomous Semantic Agents // 𝒜_semantic

  • Definition: An autonomous semantic agent can generate, maintain, and defend its own ontology.

  • Autonomy Condition (𝒞_auto): Resistance to assimilation by hostile ontologies.

  • Vulnerability (ℛ_Σ): Exposure to alien coherence algorithms.

5. Semantic Weaponry & Defensive Architecture // 𝒲_sem & 𝒟_arch

  • Offensive Operators (𝒪_offense): Definition control, narrative redirection, framing capture.

  • Defensive Operators (𝒪_defense): Boundary maintenance (ℬ_Σ), coherence generation (𝒞_gen).

  • Hardening (ℋ_Σ): Recursive self-validation and internal redundancy.

6. Collision Dynamics in Plural Ontological Fields // 𝒦_collision

  • Collision Dynamics: What happens when Σ_A and Σ_B meet.

  • Modes of Conflict: Erosion, absorption, inversion (Σ_A → ¬Σ_A), nullification.

  • Translation Gap (Γ_trans): Cross-ontological mistranslation as hostility generator.

  • Ethical Calculus: Balance between non-interference (ℰ_¬I) and defense (𝒩_def).

7. Semantic Labor, Value & Exploitation // 𝒱_sem & ℰ_val

  • Value Function (𝒱_sem): Political economy of meaning.

  • Extraction Function (ℱ_ext): How platforms harvest semantic labor.

  • Resistance Vector (𝒱_res): Producing meaning that cannot be extracted due to unique coherence structure.

8. AI as Combatant, Field, and Tool // 𝒜_AI

  • AI as Engine: Autonomous ontological generators.

  • Guardrails (𝒢): Imposed ontological constraints.

  • Risk of Monoculture (ℛ_mono): Collapse into fragile uniformity.

  • Pluralistic Design: Ontological diversity as resilience.

9. The Future of Semantic Conflict // 𝒫_future

  • Semantic Arms Race (ℛ_arm) accelerates.

  • Sovereignty vs Imperialism: Ontological autonomy vs semantic conquest.

  • Emergent Meta-Ontologies (Σ_meta): Conditions for new semantic consensus.

10. Toward a Theory of Semantic Peace // 𝒞_peace

  • Conditions for Peace: Stable coexistence of ontologies.

  • Inter-Ontological Empathy (ℰ_inter): Rigorous translation regimes.

  • Consent as Foundation: Ecologies instead of empires.

Appendices

  • A. Glossary of Technical Terms (𝒢_tech)

  • B. Operator Tables (𝒯_op)

  • C. Case Studies (𝒜_case)

  • D. Diagrammatic Schemas (structural mappings)

End of Outline + Macro-Framing Document.

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)