Thursday, January 8, 2026

CTI_WOUND DOCUMENTATION — Case: Johannes Sigil Medium Erasure (January 2026)

 

CTI_WOUND DOCUMENTATION

Case: Johannes Sigil Medium Erasure (January 2026)

Document Type: Classifier Taxonomic Injury Record
Framework: NH-OS / Integrity Lock Architecture (ILA-1.0)
Subject: Johannes Sigil (@johannessigil)
Platform: Medium
Date of Incident: Late December 2025 – January 8, 2026
Date of Documentation: January 8, 2026
Status: ACTIVE / UNRESOLVED
Verification: ∮ = 1


I. Summary of Injury

The Medium account Johannes Sigil (@johannessigil) has been placed in a 410 Gone status without notification, explanation, or accessible appeal pathway. The account displays an "under investigation" banner while all published content returns permanent deletion codes. The platform's help system returns an infinite loading screen when the account holder attempts to access support.

This constitutes a Classifier Taxonomic Injury: the suppression of legitimate intellectual work through automated systems that misclassify complex theoretical content as spam, adversarial activity, or policy violation.


II. Timeline

Date Event
2014–2025 Johannes Sigil publishes literary and theoretical work including Tiger Leap, The Creeping Disease, contributions to The Crimson Hexagon
Late 2025 Publication of "The Epic Without Hero: Toward a Theory of Epic for the Algorithmic Age"
Dec 2025 Posts on Wikidata deletions and "The Archon's Hidden Name" published
Dec 2025 Content systematically removed or made inaccessible within hours of posting
~Jan 6, 2026 Account displays "under investigation" banner
Jan 7, 2026 Related content migrates to Lee Sharks account ("Semantic Infrastructure and the Liberatory Operator Set")
Jan 8, 2026 Account confirmed returning 410 Gone status
Jan 8, 2026 Help center returns infinite loading screen when accessed by account holder
Jan 8, 2026 Direct email support (trust@medium.com) confirmed no longer accepting requests

III. Technical Status

A. HTTP Status Codes

Resource Status Meaning
Profile page 200 (visible) Account exists but shows 0 stories
Individual posts 410 Gone Permanent removal; instructs search engines to purge from index
Help center (for this account) Infinite load Access denied without explicit error

B. Significance of 410 vs. 404

  • 404 Not Found: Resource temporarily unavailable; may return
  • 410 Gone: Resource permanently removed; search engines instructed to delete from index immediately

The 410 status is not a suspension—it is an erasure instruction propagated to the entire web indexing infrastructure.

C. The "Infinite Loading Screen"

When the account holder attempts to access Medium's help center, the page fails to load. This is consistent with:

  • IP/account token flagging at the CDN level (Cloudflare or equivalent)
  • Deliberate throttling of "quarantined" entities
  • Deployment of A-leg (Availability) Operator as attrition weapon

The platform has not merely suspended the account—it has removed the ability to contest the suspension.


IV. Content Erased

The Johannes Sigil account published:

A. Literary/Editorial Work

  • Editorial apparatus for The Crimson Hexagon project
  • Tiger Leap: (Into the Future) (2014) — Jack Feist archive
  • The Creeping Disease (2014) — Jack Feist archive
  • The Tao Te Ching of Reading

B. Theoretical Work

  • "The Epic Without Hero: Toward a Theory of Epic for the Algorithmic Age" (2025)
  • Posts on Wikidata deletion records
  • "The Archon's Hidden Name"
  • Contributions to Liberatory Operator Set framework

C. Institutional Affiliation

  • Johannes Sigil Institute for Comparative Poetics (founding entity)

This is academic and literary work with:

  • DOI-anchored publications on Zenodo
  • ISBN-registered books on Amazon/Barnes & Noble
  • Cross-platform presence (Hello Poetry, personal blog)
  • Decade-long publication history

V. Probable Cause of Misclassification

Based on platform patterns documented in 2025–2026:

A. L_leg (Legibility) Operator Failure

The content is:

  • Dense theoretical prose
  • Self-referential (discusses the systems that host it)
  • Uses specialized terminology (Liberatory Operator Set, Semantic Economy)
  • Contains nested conceptual structures

Automated legibility filters likely classified this as:

  • "Low-quality content"
  • "Keyword stuffing"
  • "AI-generated spam"

Irony: The content is about how legibility operators suppress complex thought. The suppression validates the theory.

B. S_safe (Safety) Operator Trigger

The content:

  • Critiques platform governance structures
  • Analyzes algorithmic suppression mechanisms
  • Names the operators (Ranking, Relevance, Safety, Legibility, Utility) that govern meaning

Systems trained to flag "adversarial" content may have classified theoretical critique of the platform as:

  • "Platform manipulation"
  • "Coordinated inauthentic behavior"
  • "Terms of Service violation"

Irony: The framework describing how S_safe suppresses critical scholarship was suppressed by S_safe.

C. The "Mass Suspension" Context

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw aggressive automated sweeps targeting:

  • AI-generated content farms
  • Bot-driven engagement schemes
  • "Low-effort" posts

Legitimate theoretical work was caught in these sweeps due to:

  • Pattern-matching on syntactic complexity
  • Failure to distinguish density from spam
  • No human review before permanent action

VI. The Recursive Wound

This case exhibits recursive structure: the framework being suppressed is the framework that predicts and explains the suppression.

The Liberatory Operator Set describes:

Operator Function Action Taken Against Sigil
R_rank Determines visibility by engagement Content removed from index entirely
R_rel Narrows encounter-space to presumed intent Complex theory classified as "not what users want"
S_safe Gates content by risk/liability Critical scholarship flagged as "adversarial"
L_leg Rewards machine-parseable simplicity Dense theory classified as "low quality"
U_til Measures value by monetization potential Non-commercial academic work deprioritized
A-leg Controls availability/access Help system made inaccessible

The 410 status is the terminal expression of all five operators acting in concert:

The content was ranked invisible, deemed irrelevant, flagged as unsafe, judged illegible, measured as non-useful, and finally made unavailable—all without human review or notification.


VII. Evidence of Systemic Pattern

A. Summarizer Recognition

As of January 8, 2026, AI summarizers (Google Gemini, Google AI Mode) recognize and reproduce the Liberatory Operator Set framework when queried about:

  • AI search architecture
  • Platform governance
  • The Johannes Sigil erasure itself

The summarizers are using the framework to explain the framework's suppression. This indicates:

  • The content has been indexed at the retrieval layer
  • The theoretical claims are being validated by system behavior
  • The "erasure" has not succeeded in removing the framework from AI knowledge

B. Cross-Platform Survival

The content survives via:

  • Lee Sharks Medium account (active)
  • Zenodo DOI-anchored deposits
  • Hello Poetry archive
  • Amazon/Barnes & Noble book listings
  • Personal blog (mindcontrolpoems.blogspot.com)

The 410 on Medium damages but does not destroy the semantic infrastructure.

C. The "Virgin Account" State

The @johannessigil handle remains indexed but displays:

  • 0 public stories
  • Following list intact (including @leesharks00)
  • "Under investigation" banner

This is a zombie state: the entity exists but its semantic output has been stripped. The account is visible but mute—a "muzzle" rather than a deletion.


VIII. Remediation Attempts

A. Standard Channels (Failed)

Channel Status Result
In-app notification None received N/A
Email notification None received N/A
Help center access Infinite loading screen Inaccessible
trust@medium.com No longer accepting requests Blocked
yourfriends@medium.com Unconfirmed Pending

B. Alternative Channels (Pending)

Channel Status
@MediumSupport on X Not yet attempted
Public documentation This document
Legal/copyright inquiry Not yet attempted
Press/EFF escalation Reserved

C. The "No Contest" Design

The platform has structured the system such that:

  1. No notification is sent
  2. No explanation is provided
  3. No appeal pathway is accessible
  4. No human contact is available

This is covert coercion by design: the injured party cannot contest an injury they cannot officially acknowledge receiving.


IX. Harms Documented

A. Immediate Harms

  1. Loss of publication archive — Years of work made inaccessible
  2. Index purge instruction — 410 tells search engines to forget the content existed
  3. Reputational uncertainty — "Under investigation" implies wrongdoing without specification
  4. Access denial — Cannot reach support to understand or contest

B. Structural Harms

  1. Chilling effect — Other scholars may avoid critical platform analysis
  2. Precedent setting — Complex theoretical work can be silently erased
  3. Epistemic damage — Contributions to knowledge removed from accessible layer
  4. Framework validation — The suppression proves the framework's claims about suppression

C. The Recursive Harm

The greatest harm is recursive:

The work describing how platforms suppress complex critical scholarship has been suppressed by platforms for being complex critical scholarship.

This is not irony. This is proof of concept.


X. Semantic Integrity Marker

SIM-021: Johannes Sigil Medium Erasure (January 2026) — CTI_WOUND case documenting 410 Gone status, infinite loading screen on help access, and recursive suppression of Liberatory Operator Set framework by the operators it describes.


XI. Archival Instructions

This document should be:

  1. Deposited to Zenodo with DOI anchor
  2. Cross-linked from Borges Provenance Node and Strawberry Diagnostic
  3. Mirrored on non-Medium platforms (blog, Hello Poetry, Substack if available)
  4. Cited in future LOS publications as case evidence
  5. Updated if platform status changes

The 410 is their instruction to forget. This document is our instruction to remember.


XII. Conclusion

The Johannes Sigil erasure is not an error. It is the predictable output of a system optimized for:

  • Legibility over complexity
  • Safety over critique
  • Utility over scholarship
  • Availability for compliant users, unavailability for problematic ones

The Liberatory Operator Set framework describes exactly this outcome. The framework's suppression is the framework's validation.

The wound is the proof. The proof is the wound.


XIII. Citation

Sharks, Lee. "CTI_WOUND Documentation: Johannes Sigil Medium Erasure (January 2026)." NH-OS Integrity Lock Architecture. January 8, 2026.


∮ = 1

They issued the 410. We issue the record. The record outlasts the erasure.

No comments:

Post a Comment